This article is about the painting. For other uses, see Son of man disambiguation. Ideas and Images, trans. Richard Millen New York: An Affair to Remember". Retrieved from " https: Articles containing French-language text All articles that may contain original research Articles that may contain original research from September Views Read Edit View history.
This page was last edited on 11 September , at Jun 09, Col rated it it was amazing. A psychedelic far future romp, in which a modern man plays the part of the atavistic primitive, transported to a world that is barely recognizable as Earth. The protagonist's guides are the jovial humanoid "Skimmers", who invite him to participate in their cosmos shaking sex rituals as they travel across the earth, along the way experiencing changes in sex and species, encountering several descendant species of humanity, and the bizarre "zones", places that distill the experiences Slow, Old and A psychedelic far future romp, in which a modern man plays the part of the atavistic primitive, transported to a world that is barely recognizable as Earth.
The protagonist's guides are the jovial humanoid "Skimmers", who invite him to participate in their cosmos shaking sex rituals as they travel across the earth, along the way experiencing changes in sex and species, encountering several descendant species of humanity, and the bizarre "zones", places that distill the experiences Slow, Old and Dark.
Son of Man
Don't look for coherence and you'll have a wild ride. Jan 31, Diana rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: This is my favorite Robert Silverberg book. Robert Silverberg is one of my favorite SF writers. Son of Man was written at the height of his greatest period, which lasted from the mid-sixties to somewhere in the latter part of the s. Yet, it's also perhaps his most difficult book to evaluate. I know some who dislike it. Others consider it one of his best Silverberg himself seems to view it that way. In some ways, it can be described as the book that would have been produced had Olaf Stapledon written in the style of the new wave.
It' Robert Silverberg is one of my favorite SF writers. It's an incredible look of the future man, across multiple forms, told in a flowing, colorful style, with characters often looking toward their feelings and their sexuality as much as at the marvels around them. Clay, the main character, awakens to find himself far in the future, befriended by a group of future humans, in a world where humans in many past forms some almost mountain-like, some like strange spheres, some like dinosaurs still live.
- Synthetic Coordination and Organometallic Chemistry;
- Autumn: The City (Autumn series);
- Shaman Pass: A Nathan Active Mystery (Nathan Active Mysteries)!
- Surrender To A Sex Therapist (Surrender Series Book 1)!
- See a Problem?!
- The Son of Man - Wikipedia;
The novel follows Clay across this world as he encounters the people and marvels. There is no real plot, per se; this is more a fantastic travelogue, both external and internal. It's an experience worth having, but in the end there are at least a dozen Silverberg works I'd rank higher. Jun 25, Chris rated it it was ok.
By far the most ambitious Silverberg novel I've read, and perhaps the least entertaining. An ambitious work doesn't necessarily have to be entertaining to be worth reading, but this one fell too flat for me to recommend. A man from our time wakes in the far future to go on a voyage experiencing different aspects of the human condition. I suspect any of these works will be very rewarding if By far the most ambitious Silverberg novel I've read, and perhaps the least entertaining. I suspect any of these works will be very rewarding if you are on the author's wavelength - an experience I came closest to with Lindsay.
Weird, weird and freaking weird. I don't know what to make of this book, I almost didn't finish reading it a couple times because it's downward spiral into insanity didn't abate. But despite all that there is a certain fascination that kept me reading, Silverberg is creating a fantastical far, far, FAR future and making it wholly his own. I can respect the imagination and creativity that went into the work, even if I don't appreciate the result. Oct 05, Mike rated it it was ok. By far the worst Robert Silverberg book. The premise is intriguing enough: Nothing works in this novel.
Silverberg's otherwise brilliant style here reads like some postmodernist nightmare. Plot is ludicrus,pace uneven and the story boring. Jan 27, Bill rated it did not like it. This book is horrible i just couldnt finish it. There's no plot whatsoever. It's all the answer to the question, "What will humanity evolve into and what if they could all be in the same room? I think Silver berg was on drugs when he wrote this. Don't waste your money on this. Biggest mistake in my library!! Mar 25, Ray Gardener rated it liked it. I hate to admit it, but this book was tedious.
Which is a shame because it's a bold departure from the norm and it stays with you long after. I'm glad I slogged through it, but while I might reread certain parts, I know I'll never find the strength to read the whole thing again. Definitely gives me mixed emotions. Nov 12, Welles Bristol rated it really liked it. Entertaining, vivid, and appropriately convoluted. Aug 05, Amber rated it it was ok. I finished two books in the last few days, both with protagonists named Clay who could not be more different.
Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but the name Clay implies molding of character, malleability, a willingness to grow and be shaped into something more than you were. One of these Clays fulfills this promise - but not, unfortunately, the one from this book. Is it ironic that the most human of these Clays, the one who is warm, devoted to friends, insecure and impetuous at times, aware I finished two books in the last few days, both with protagonists named Clay who could not be more different.
Is it ironic that the most human of these Clays, the one who is warm, devoted to friends, insecure and impetuous at times, aware of his failings but never driven by them to petty jealous acts, the one who gives others respect and maintains an ethical core, is actually not human at all, but rather a dragon? But this is a review of Son of Man, and the Clay here has less character, though a more-human appearance. Inhabiting a book devoted to exploring the nature of huamnity across time and space, a book where humanity comes in myriad, beautifully-imagined forms, this Clay is disappointingly hollow, a rapacious, self-involved, entitled misogynist of a being whose chief pleasure seems to be mounting anything that moves, who deals with fear of the unknown through sexual conquest.
Both of these books The Dragonet Prophecy, yes a middle-grade novel, and this one are written by gifted, innovative, and in many ways literature-enriching authors who write in genres that have been many-times-maligned YA for TDP, sci fi for SOM , and both are works of speculative fiction. Yet one of them depicts the best in humanity - the other, crawling mediocrity. Both figures are everymen, intended to both represent and gain the sympathy of the reader, who is led by the narrative3 to identify with htem. But, though both seek friendship, both are accepted by some characters and rejected by others, the dragon-Clay endears the reader while the human-Clay repulses.
Is it fair to compare two books from completely different genres in this way, just because their protagonist shares the same name? Maybe not - but this is more a personal-response-to-book than a public-review for me, and I just couldn't help being struck by the stark contrasts. The language of this book, as is usual with Silverberg who I highly admire, and whose books I usually love , is beautiful, intricate, intriguing in its almost stream-of-consciousness worldbuilding. But the plotless story, the shallowness of the characters, and the misogynist aspects kind of ruined this book for me.
Mar 21, Daniel rated it it was ok. Robert Silverberg's mid-career metamorphosis from Johnny-come-lately Golden Ager to New Wave virtuoso couldn't have happened without a few bumps in the road, and this was one of them. I read and loved some of his other mid-career novels The Book of Skulls and Dying Inside , and Son of Man seemed the next logical stop on my literary tour.
Unfortunately, it wasn't nearly as successful as those other works. Son of Man is by no means without its charms; the outre ultra-far-future setting and fluid s Robert Silverberg's mid-career metamorphosis from Johnny-come-lately Golden Ager to New Wave virtuoso couldn't have happened without a few bumps in the road, and this was one of them.
Son of Man is by no means without its charms; the outre ultra-far-future setting and fluid style allow for some inspired surreality.
- 1 Enoch: the Son of Man - Livius?
- Wofür stehst du?: Was in unserem Leben wichtig ist - Eine Suche. (German Edition).
- The Son of Man by Rene Magritte;
- 1 Enoch: the Son of Man.
Some of the images conjured were truly remarkable I'm thinking specifically of the mournful, long-abandoned god of the toad-people , but the overall effect was lacking. It never coalesces around its themes or characters, and suffers for it. In the end it feels more like an extended writing exercise "Give me 50, words of psychosexual, psychedelic meandering and GO! I am by no means someone who demands "plotfulness" or clarity from literature hell, Gene Wolfe is one of my favorite writers of all time , but Son of Man doesn't have that indefinable it that can make a novel consisting of what are essentially a series of sensory impressions click.
An interesting from a context standpoint non-success from one of the greats. Jan 01, Alex rated it it was ok. A totally arbitrary depiction of a possible, extremely distant future where everything centers around sex and strange, unexplained rituals. One of the few interesting parts was the description of the protagonist's first sexual experience after changing from a male to a female and no, that doesn't give anything away.
Son of Man by Robert Silverberg
Still, I'd say re read "The Time Machine" instead. It does not seem fitting. May 26, Ryan rated it liked it. Silverberg partook of some "good stuff" while writing this book. This book confronts the question of what it means to be human as well as a human in our society. This book feels like it was an attempt by Bukowski to write science fiction while channelling Ishiguro's narrator in The Unconsoled. Jumped into t 3 different, yet similar, brief reviews of Robert Silverberg's Son of Man. Jumped into this book with a main character named Hanmer.
Sep 28, Graham Alston rated it really liked it. This would have been an excellent read when I was first introduced to Science Fiction. Its not Asimov or Clarke but in a realm of its own. Thouroughly enjoyable if you want to explore an attempt at what our future as humans might be some millions of years to come. The sayings dealing with the coming or apocalyptic Son of man likewise turn up in Mark Mark 8: This double strand of tradition or multiple attestation can encourage one to attribute to Jesus at least class 1 and class 3 of the Son of man sayings.
Third, there was some Jewish background to Jesus' Son of man sayings, but there was scarcely any follow-up in the emerging Church.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Later on the Church Fathers would use the term as a way of referring to Christ's humanity as opposed to his divinity or to his being the Son of God. However, in the first century the designation does not seem to have been useful in preaching the good news. It does not appear in credal and liturgical formulas. It was too flexible and even vague: Linguistically, it was a particularly odd expression for Greek-speaking people. The fact that the designation was strange and unsuitable for the early Church's life and ministry suggests that the Son of man sayings did not derive from groups in the Church, but from another source, which could only really be Jesus himself.
Fourth, the sayings about the coming Son of man sometimes imply a certain differentiation between this figure and Jesus. Therefore, Luke reports Jesus as declaring: Matthew modiefies this Q saying to read: Apparently, Luke has preserved the original form of the saying, which indicates a certain unity of function between Jesus himself and the Son of man, but at the same time introduces some differentiation between the two figures.
The differentiation makes sense once it is recognised that it recalls a turn of phrase actually used by Jesus to distinguish his present preaching from his future judging. The distinction had its point in the historical context of his ministry, but not later in the post-Easter situation where believers acknowledged the personal unity between the risen Jesus and the Son of man who would come in glory. Matthew's modification reflects precisely that shift.
Fifth, there are some unusual features about the preservation of the "Son of man" sayings.
The three classes are not blended together. Thus 2 the passion predictions about the Son of man do not go beyond the death and resurrection to include 3 statements about the future coming of the Son of man. Furthermore, the sayings about God's kingdom and, specifically, the parables never introduce the Son of man. After all, Daniel 7 was relevant for the functions of the Son of man, and the Danielic imagery had included God's kingdom Daniel 2: The independence of the three classes of Son of man sayings and the separation of the kingdom sayings from the Son of man can be explained if one sees the Gospels and the traditions behind them accurately preserving here distinctions that genuinely went back to Jesus' actual preaching and teaching.
However, while of all the Christological titles used in the New Testament, Son of God has had one of the most lasting impacts in Christian history and has become part of the profession of faith by many Christians, the proclamation of Son of man has never been an article of faith in Christianity. In the 5th century, Saint Augustine wrote at length on the Son of God and its relationship with the Son of man , positioning the two issues in terms of the dual nature of Jesus as both divine and human in terms of the hypostatic union.
God before all worlds, man in our world But since he is the only Son of God, by nature and not by grace, he became also the Son of Man that he might be full of grace as well. Although Son of man is a distinct concept from Son of God, some gospel passages may seem to equate them in some cases, e. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article is about Christian teachings.
For an overview, see Son of man. For other usage, see Son of man disambiguation. Christianity in the Making by James D. Q-Z by Geoffrey W. An Introduction by Alister E. The historical Jesus in recent research. Lee Library, Brigham Young University. Retrieved 19 January Pearl of Great Price. Retrieved 19 August That the term does not appear in any of the epistles ascribed to Paul is significant. Most of the recent writers among them being II. Lietzmann have come to the conclusion that Jesus, speaking Aramaic, could never have designated himself as the "son of man" in a Messianic, mystic sense, because the Aramaic term never implied this meaning.
For this and subsequent observations and commentary, compare Gerald O'Collins , Christology: OUP , pp.
Dunn , Christology in the Making , London: